Foreign Policy Journal | 11 Sept 2015

Fourteen years after the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, a great many questions about the events of that day remain unanswered. Unfortunately, even most popular alternative publications refuse to touch this subject. Foreign Policy Journal is among the few that have been unafraid to ask the hard questions.

Here are some of the best of the best from FPJ contributors over the years on the subject of 9/11

Jeremy R. Hammond

The Mysterious Collapse of World Trade Center 7: Case Far From Closed

According to the government’s official account, WTC 7 collapsed due to office fires. Many independent researchers and scientists, however, including professional architects and engineers, disagree.

9/11 and Skeptic Magazine’s ‘Science’ of Controlled Demolitions

• Video Analysis of NIST’s Claim of a 5.4 s Collapse Time Over 18 Stories for WTC 7

• Newly Disclosed Documents Shed More Light on Early Taliban Offers, Pakistan Role

• The Washington Post on ‘lunatic’ 9/11 ‘conspiracy theorists’

• Al Qaeda’s Top Gun

Kevin Ryan

Evidence for Informed Trading on the Attacks of September 11

It is time for an independent, international investigation into the informed trades and the traders who benefited from the terrorist acts of September 11th.

Are Tall Buildings Safer As a Result of the NIST WTC Reports?

• How to Debunk WTC Thermite

Michael Fullerton

A Scientific Theory of the WTC 7 Collapse

Not only have extremely important scientific questions about this tragedy gone unanswered, but they have even been ridiculed to the point of deranged absurdity.

9/11 Skeptopathy: Pathological Skepticism In Support of the Falsified Official Story

• Uncritical Thinking in Support of the Faith-based Official 9/11 Myth

Paul Craig Roberts

Does 9/11 Truth Have A Chance?

During four days of hearings, distinguished scientists and scholars and professional architects and engineers presented the results of years of their independent research into all aspects of 9/11 to a distinguished panel.

David Ray Griffin

Did 9/11 Justify the War in Afghanistan?

The US says it had the moral right, arising from the universal right of self-defense, to attempt to capture or kill bin Laden and his al-Qaeda network to prevent them from launching another attack on our country. The only problem with this argument is that all three points are false.

Lars Schall

Is the Whole “War on Terror” a Fraud?

“Visas for Al Qaeda” author J. Michael Springmann talks to Lars Schall on the CIA’s role at the State Department’s visa bureau in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.

Brian A. Burchill

9/11: The Terrorism Trump Card

The 9/11 issue has moved from conspiracy theories and street protests into the realm of laboratories and peer-reviewed science journals.

Mark H. Gaffney

Black 9/11: A Walk on the Dark Side

This paper will review the evidence for informed, or insider, trading in the days and hours before the 9/11 attacks

Elizabeth Woodworth

Why the Fuss? The Call to Arms against UN Rapporteur Richard Falk for Alluding to Gaps in the 9/11 Official Story

J. Michael Springmann

Crime Really Does Pay (But Only If You Work for the CIA)

The US worked hand in hand with Saudi Arabia and its asset Osama bin Laden to recruit fighters for the war in Afghanistan.

Franke Legge and David Chandler

The Pentagon Attack on 9/11: A Refutation of the Flyover Hypothesis Based on Analysis of the Flight Path

William Blum

The 9/11 Truth Movement

The Truthers have long been pressing me to express my support for their cause. Here’s how I stand on the issue.

Shawn Hamilton

Rethinking Conspiracy

The terms “conspiracy theorist” and “conspiracy nut” are used frequently to discredit a perceived adversary using emotional rather than logical appeals.