Salon | 7 June 2016
Hillary said murder of terrorists’ family is war crime—yet Obama admin may have done this to Abdulrahman al-Awlaki
In her self-declared “major” foreign policy speech on June 2, presidential candidate Hillary Clinton indirectly admitted that the U.S. government’s drone killings of family members of suspected militants, namely Abdulrahman al-Awlaki, if intentional, was a war crime.
Clinton blasted Republican presidential front-runner Donald Trump for saying “he would order our military to carry out torture and the murder of civilians who are related to suspected terrorists — even though those are war crimes.”
Yet, while she served as secretary of state, Clinton’s own U.S. government administration may have overseen the very atrocity that she accidentally acknowledged is a war crime.
Hundreds of civilians, many of whom were innocent family members of suspected militants, have been killed in U.S. drone strikes in Yemen, Pakistan, Somalia and more. If any of these killings were intentional, they were war crimes.
As Gabor Rona, a professor of the law of armed conflict at Columbia Law School, explained in a message to Salon, international law makes a distinction between intentional and unintentional killings of civilians.
Rona said he believes that “U.S. targeted-killing policy violates international law,” and noted that “failure to take adequate precautions to prevent civilian casualties is a war crime.”
But Clinton said that the “murder” of civilians is a war crime, not just the “killing.” Rona noted he’s “sure that her choice of terminology was deliberate and vetted by lawyers.”
If the Obama administration intentionally killed family members of suspected terrorists in drone attacks, that constitutes murder, not just a killing, and is a war crime.
This brings up the most prominent example of family members killed in U.S. drone strikes: that of the al-Awlakis.
On Oct. 14, 2011, a U.S. drone strike killed 16-year-old U.S. citizen Abdulrahman al-Awlaki, along with his teenage cousin and at least five more civilians, blowing them up as they ate dinner at an outdoor restaurant in Yemen.
Why did the U.S. kill a teenage U.S. citizen in a country where it is not officially at war? Years of investigation by an award-winning journalist suggests that it may have been an intentional killing — not because Abdulrahman was involved in terrorist activity, but rather because his father, Anwar al-Awlaki, was a propagandist for al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula.
That is to say, using Hillary Clinton’s own language, President Obama may have overseen “the murder of civilians who are related to suspected terrorists — even though that’s a war crime.”
Anwar al-Awlaki was assassinated by another CIA airstrike on Sep. 30, 2011, just two weeks before his son was killed. He was never given a chance in court, despite the fact that he was a U.S. citizen. He was killed extrajudicially, without a sliver of due process.
After Abdulrahman and his cousin were killed, U.S. officials leaked the story to the press, claiming he had been 21-years-old. Yet his family had his birth certificate, which proved he was 16 and had been born in Denver, Colorado.
Then they claimed Abdulrahman was linked to Ibrahim al-Banna, an Egyptian member of al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula. Award-winning journalist Jeremy Scahill, who spent years investigating the killing, interviewing U.S. officials, speaking to Abdulrahman’s family and friends and poring over government documents, concluded otherwise, noting, “There is not a shred of evidence to indicate that this boy had anything to do with terrorism whatsoever.”