Why mandates are completely nonsensical

Steve Kirsch | 12 Nov 2021

A short proof based on a new UC Davis/UCSF study showing the viral loads of the vaccinated and unvaccinated are identical.

Let’s be clear.

COVID vaccine mandates are necessary because the protected need to be protected from the unprotected by forcing the unprotected to use the protection that didn’t protect the protected.

Get it?

Second federal judge rejects effort to block Oregon vaccine mandate - KTVZ

study from UC Davis and UCSF authors published on October 5, 2021 show conclusively that the viral loads are exactly the the same in vaccinated and unvaccinated.

“No Significant Difference in Viral Load Between Vaccinated and Unvaccinated, Asymptomatic and Symptomatic Groups Infected with SARS-CoV-2 Delta Variant.

The data gathered in this study during the surge of the Delta variant strongly support the notion that neither vaccine status nor the presence or absence of symptoms should influence the recommendation and implementation of good public health practices, including mask wearing, testing, social distancing, and other measures designed to mitigate the spread of SARS-CoV-2.”

In other words, the latest data from UCSF shows that basing public health practices on vaccination status is nonsensical. A person who is unvaccinated is just as likely to have and spread COVID as someone who is vaccinated. They are no different. If they were different, we’d see it clearly in that study (which sampled people at random times).

In short, we are not following the science at all with mandates. We are mandating something that makes no difference to the health of others. Mandates only infringe our liberties to do what we choose with our body.

I received this message that some employers have figured this out so now require that you get vaccinated to protect yourself. Wow. Never seen that before. Here’s the message:

Another clear example of the insanity: The CDC admits that there isn’t a single known case of a person with “recovered immunity” infecting someone with COVID. So if you have had COVID, you should SURELY be exempt from both vaccine mandates and testing. Yet we treat such people the same as unvaccinated. There is absolutely no way to justify that. The data is unambiguous.

We are not following the science

And to make matters worse, nobody in the medical community is raising any objections! They are all brain dead. This stuff couldn’t be more obvious.

Is there a hidden benefit that the vaccinated are less likely to get infected? Well, the study only looked at infected people, so that’s possible. However, the way the vaccine works is to create antibodies and T-cell immunity that would fight off any infection that came in. So a working vaccine would always show a significantly lower level of infection for all vaccinated people at all times. We see no difference. So explain to me the mechanism of how you think the vaccine is preventing infection? A new magical process?

Is there a hidden benefit that people who are vaccinated are less likely to be hospitalized like they say? No, there is nothing we’ve seen in any of the research that would lead to this. Everything we have measured shows the opposite: it basically suppresses your immune system in general, raises D-dimer, raises troponin, etc. All bad things. The only potentially good thing it does do is raise your antibody levels, but clearly these antibodies aren’t making much of a difference based on this study since the virus has mutated to avoid the vaccines.

But overall, the vaccines are a huge net negative. This is easy to see from hospital all-cause admission data (which is rarely cited because it is so damaging). For example, Aaron Siri documents the case of a hospital with a 90% admission rate of vaccinated patients in an area where only 50% of the patients are vaccinated. That’s impossible if there were overall health benefits from the vaccine. Nobody can explain this.

A working brain is required to see the vaccine mandates are nonsensical

Chris Martenson examined the evidence for the mandates as well. In his YouTube video summary he wrote, “At this point, anyone with a working brain can see that whatever the vaccine mandate push is for, that it is not about public health and stopping the transmission of COVID.”https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/gnB8Tep92Us?rel=0&autoplay=0&showinfo=0&enablejsapi=0

Obviously, we couldn’t agree more. Additional points to consider:

  1. Harvard study shows clearly that the more vaccinated you are, the higher the cases. This is exactly the opposite of what was claimed.
  2. If you look at all-cause hospital admissions, they have a higher percentage of the vaccinated than the unvaccinated showing the vaccines are clearly negatively affecting people’s health. For example, 90% vaccinated admission rate in an area with a 50% vaccinated population. That’s impossible for anyone to explain (which is why the CDC and FDA refuse to explain it and ignore it instead). The vaccinated are the healthy patient bias patients so it should be just the opposite.
  3. Early treatments are a much better option than using a non-sterilizing vaccine in the middle of a pandemic, even if it was perfectly safe.
  4. UK data shows quite clearly that vaccinated people do significantly worse after a brief honeymoon period of 20 days. The more jabs you get the worse it gets. It then goes negative where the vaccinated are more likely to be infected. The UK Health Security Agency has reported a higher rate of infection in the fully vaxxed age 30 and older for the last six weeks. Nobody has pointed out an error in the UK data. This creates doubt. Does anyone seriously believe that human biology is different on the other side of the pond? The CDC is either lying or incompetent or both. Shouldn’t we be absolutely sure if we are going to mandate an intervention that is irreversible?

The tests required by vaccine mandates are also nonsensical

Not only are the mandates themselves nonsensical, but the testing requirements are as well. Typically, they require the unvaccinated to get tested frequently. You are allowed to use a rapid-test if you don’t have symptoms. If you have symptoms, you are required to use a PCR test.

The reason why this is absurd is that the rapid tests won’t show positive unless you are symptomatic. So it is a complete waste of money.

If you know of a counter example, let me know in the comments.

Even more proof

This one is tough to argue against. CNN is always picking on Florida. Whoops. This has to be embarrassing to them. So they don’t talk about it and keep you in the dark.

And nobody wants to talk about this:

Still not convinced? Even more proof

Injecting FreedomStudy Destroys Justification for Vaccine MandatesCivil and individual rights are only meaningful if they continue to protect individuals during difficult situations. It is why the U.S. Supreme Court upheld the right of neo-Nazis to march through Jewish neighborhoods. It is why it upheld the right to burn the American flag. Protecting these rights when it is difficult protects us all. It assures th…Read more25 days ago · 220 likes · 65 comments · Aaron Siri


The bottom line is that an objective look at both the science and the data says that the mandates make absolutely no sense.

We aren’t science driven; we are doing what Joe Biden wants, even when it is completely unnecessary and stupid.

Biden seriously needs to seek advice from diverse viewpoints on this issue. Right now, he’s only getting advice from people who believe that the current vaccines are the only solution.

Leave a Reply