Masks were performative epidemiological cosplay; there was never any basis in fact or public health.

Bad Cattitude | 15 Feb 2022

some tweets age like fine wine.

others age like a fish head i lost under the refrigerator that one time.

and here we can see both as once more the “amateurs” outperform “the experts.”

because this was all obvious to anyone who was looking at the facts instead of pushing an agenda.

this was known and knowable.

this wild multi-year joy ride with lives and livelihoods was as unsubstantiated as it was unprecedented.

the rancid aroma of “smug, self-righteous, and wrong” wafting off of david’s comments is really something, isn’t it?

and when even the washpo, point of the covidiot spear that it is, is edging away from masks, well, we can surely see who won and who lost, can’t we?

even the CDC has been reduced to publishing scientific parody in the form of self selected response surveys to prop up their doomed narrative.

masks were a symbol of submission and tribal allegiance to a pseudoscientific virtue cult.

the data from 12 different directions was overwhelmingly against this idea.

bad cattitudeyour mask protects me

it was painfully obvious right from the beginning that the whole notion was invented as a low energy path for performative “doing something.”

it accentuated a sense of crisis, alienated individuals, and carved out bright lines of social conflict. and it did nothing at all of epidemiological value. this was known and knowable.

the WHO’s 2019 study of masks vs respiratory virus was quite definitive.

Image

and the evidence from actual RCT’s carried out in covid (such as DANMASK) backs this up.

so did the data from SCHOOLS.

but even this wholesale fabrication “for your protection” was insufficient. there was a need to impose a moral dimension and thus was born the entirely invented tagline of “your mask protects me.”

this made your actions a part of my health and thus allowed me to make moral demands of you. but these demands were false. it was public manipulation, not public health.

the absurd notion of “source protection” was literally invented from whole cloth to impose a sense of social obligation and force compliance through shaming of failing in a duty to others.

this was “validated” with ginned up mannequin studies and nonsense sneeze tests that lacked any clinical outcomes data whatsoever.

masks do not even work as source control in surgical theaters when worn by trained professionals.

in fact, they were associated with higher post op infection rates in patients.

everybody knew this. it was no secret.

the aerosol science was so glaring that anyone with rudimentary familiarity would see right through this idea.

“the science” was not followed. it was circumvented, inverted, and twisted into something altogether unrecognizable.

the “experts” who did this either had no idea what they were talking about or knowingly lied because it served their own ends.

they hectored and they moralized and they bullied.

they did everything but actually apply the data driven pandemic plans we’ve had for decades.

this has been a railroading.

and this is why they have earned such opprobrium.

and this is why we cannot and will not trust them anymore.

they turned on us and when they did, some stood against them.

and their names will be remembered.

Leave a Reply