TCW | 18 Mar 2022
WE GOT it right from the start. I have just checked back to see TCW’s very first article on the subject of masks, published on August 31 2020. Pity no one made the Government listen.
Writer Harold Armitage, a retired electrical engineer and filtration expert, told readers in no uncertain terms that ‘your average member of the public/journalist has no clue on the complicated topic of filtration’. If they did they would have understood the uselessness of face masks from day one and not so foolishly complied.
It is very, very hard to believe however that Vallance, Whitty and Van-Tam did not know what Armitage set out, that:
· Viruses are too small to be filtered; and referred to as ‘unfilterable’ bacilli.
· The holes in the fabric are far too big to trap a virus mechanically.
· The face mask is damp from your breath, and the minute particles of mucus and saliva containing the virus stick to the fabric.
· When you take the mask off, it dries out and the viruses can be released which is why ideally it should be destroyed/disposed of immediately.
These three men are truly culpable. As early as October 2020 the findings of a major peer-reviewed Danish study demonstrated the straightforward logic of Armitage’s science. Masks didn’t work, it found. Surprise, surprise. This, however, became known as the mask study that the medical journals dared not print. Why not? Well, the findings did not conform with Government policy.
Six months on, as well as lacking efficacy for reducing transmission or infection, masks were found to be full of pollutants and unhealthy to wear. Another hardly surprising finding. This was confirmed by Swansea University at the beginning of May 2021.
Despite and indeed in face of the science, the Government continued with its comprehensive mask mandate. Even after Johnson’s so-called Freedom Day on July 23, 2021, it continued to force them on us for months, and for children in schools all the way through to the end of January 2022, with all the psychological damage this fear weapon will have caused.
Now another study has been published – you might say too late – and yet again it confirms the ‘bleedin’ obvious’, that ‘Face Covering Mask Mandates (FCMs) in schools were not associated with lower SARS-CoV-2 incidence or transmission, suggesting that this intervention was not effective‘. (The apparent studied obedience of the PC scientist authors is almost too painful to read.)
Forcing masks on children unnecessarily has been little less than criminal. Those responsible need to be held to account and the complicit scientists should be hanging their heads in shame over what has been inflicted and the corrupting fear and anxiety the masks have induced as well as their sheer discomfort. If ever an apology was needed, it is for this.
