How the Globalists Keep Little New Zealand in Line

Guy Hatchard | 14 Aug 2022

A Conspiracy of Silence and a Litany of Lies Part 2

Yesterday I wrote about the High Court decision rejecting a petition questioning child mRNA vaccinations.

Last night I was able to read the full judgement in detail which was something of a revelation.

Justice Gendall wrote (Clause 54) that he thought the government’s approval of child mRNA vaccinations was reasonable because:

“…earlier, all pharmaceutical regulators from Australia, United Kingdom, United States, Europe, Singapore and Canada reached the same conclusion on all the expert evidence before them to approve the Paediatric Vaccine in their jurisdictions.”

Perhaps Justice Gendall was unaware that Medsafe is a member of the International Coalition of Medicines Regulatory Authorities (ICMRA), as are all the other regulators in the countries he mentions.

In fact, ICMRA has forty members. It is a non-governmental organisation heavily influenced by the pharmaceutical industry and the World Health Organisation.

ICMRA members closely coordinate through a shared database which means that most of the medicines regulatory authorities around the world have used the same ICMRA-supplied information templates to reach their decisions—information co-created by pro-pharmaceutical funded sources.

Even our government may be unaware just how much influence the pharmaceutical industry has on our Ministry of Health decisions through the back door of ICMRA.

Globalists are anxious to control little people in New Zealand and stave off any original and constructive thoughts they might entertain. Control of information is a vital part of the process. Our government has uncritically facilitated this.

In fact, the very computers that we often think are setting us free are actually also tools of global control. Databases and AI systems can rigidly control what lands on the desks of compliant and complacent minds sitting in government offices.

There are many philosophical elements and indeed myths contributing to a global takeover strategy:

  • The decline in original writing and thought and long format reading, which has been supplanted by cutting, pasting, and sharing imposed ideas.
  • The idea that there are infallible global sources of information and authority; which runs parallel to the cult of international personalities and wealth.
  • The rejection and suppression of anything natural because it can’t be patented, along with legal mechanisms to monopolise patents.
  • The rejection of the role of subjective, intuitive, and cultural knowledge in favour of solely objectivised mechanical concepts; which silently reject the quantum mechanical self-referral nature discovered by modern physics.
  • The decline in individual and national self-sufficiency. Essential items in every country are now made overseas and controlled by global capital, leaving every nation vulnerable to decisions they cannot influence.

The acceptance and proliferation of these and many other ideas has been gradual, almost imperceptible. The growth of computer controlled mechanisation has led to a great deal of comfort, but it has also led to the loss of a great many personal skills.

Globalists would like us to define ourselves through which machines we own, what medicines we take, what global brands we wear and consume. All of which are monetised.

Overwhelmed with this object-referral concept of reality, we have forgotten just how powerful our own mind is. The ancient health system of India, Ayurveda, defines this forgetting as the essential source of disease—becoming disconnected from who you really are, referred to as the ‘mistake of the intellect’.

This mistake includes relinquishing authentication of ideas and truth to third party ‘authorities’. Thus Justice Gendal was able to delegate and bypass a thorough assessment of safety research. He ruled:

Clause 42 “I need to say at the outset that, as I see the position, it is not the role of this Court on judicial review to decide which experts are right, nor to form its own opinion on the desirability of the Paediatric Vaccine being supplied in New Zealand. [that he said is the role of government experts].

The judge responded to evidence as follows:

Clause 62 “The applicants in their submissions raise numerous concerns regarding the safety of the Paediatric Vaccine, pointing to what they contend are adverse event reports following vaccination…

He continued: “the rate of vaccine-induced myocarditis across all age groups appears to be very low, being about 30 per million in New Zealand [a ridiculously low figure supplied by the Ministry of Health without any evidence to corroborate it. See this study, the measured real world risk is as much as 10,000 times higher].

He continued: “That risk, too, is substantially lower for children [also unsubstantiated by definitive evidence, but accepted by the judge on the authority of the MoH]”,

Clause 63 “… there is no real-world evidence that exists to demonstrate these are actual risks of the vaccine ….[thus naively accepting the MoH’s ridiculous assertion that temporal association can be ignored and discounted when assessing causality]

Clause 64 “This Court has also rejected claims that …. the absence of longer-term safety data was a cause for concern.”

Since when did courts believe that the longer term safety of children should not be their legitimate concern? In all this, we seem to have forgotten that we are dealing with human life. The loss of a life cannot be reduced to a mere statistic.

Nothing illustrates the direction this sort of thinking can take more than the evolution of euthanasia laws. In Canada, which arguably has the world’s most permissive laws, people with disabilities and treatable conditions like hearing loss or mental health issues are being permitted to end their lives.

There is some suggestion that doctors have acted improperly to encourage the vulnerable and even the young to end their own lives. It is just a small step to realising that people suffering medical misadventure or side effects such as those caused by genetic experiments could be euthanized, all paid for by the government.

Today Stuff newspaper, with a documentary entitled Beyond the Fringe (a title shared by a popular BBC radio comedy show), has sought once again to demonise the voices questioning the safety of mRNA vaccination. According to Stuff, their aim is nothing less than a plot to make New Zealand ungovernable (???).

To bolster its case, Stuff describes a local councillor’s suggestion that the Pfizer mRNA vaccine is an experimental drug as “a frequently made, but inaccurate claim.” An appalling and laughable criticism of a simple truth.

Stuff might do well to investigate the strange case of the disappearing CDC claims about safety. In the most recent version of CDC advice about mRNA vaccine safety, the section entitled “The mRNA and the spike protein do not last long in the body” has been quietly removed.

Multiple research findings indicate that the spike protein is both very toxic and very persistent following mRNA vaccination—a safety busting revelation. No doubt the CDC removed the offending paragraph in order to avoid falling foul of the punitive American courts.

In addition, on 11 August, the CDC completely back tracked on pandemic quarantine measures:

  • Those exposed to the virus are no longer required to quarantine
  • Unvaccinated now have the same guidance as vaccinated people
  • Students can stay in class after being exposed to the virus
  • It is no longer recommended to screen those without symptoms

In other words, the pandemic is over, except in isolated New Zealand and Australia, where the courts and mainstream media are determined to back extensive and misguided government restrictions to the hilt.

I want to finish here with the view from Sweden (and all the Nordic nations). They do not share the views of the New Zealand courts about forcing pandemic measures on our children. They rejoice that they have escaped such excesses and harmful mistakes. After the latest myopic court ruling in New Zealand, you might find this article refreshing, entitled Sacrificing Children’s health in the name of Health.

Leave a Reply