NZDSOS | 25 Sep 2022
Doctors or citizens, we are all being steadily marched into a world where big corporations dictate what we are allowed or not allowed to do – for our own health. The mandates may have been partially dropped (Te Whatu Ora Health NZ is still requiring its staff to be vaccinated and boosted) but an important issue remains:
The Relentless Suppression of Medical Practitioners
Taking away your choice as a patient and the livelihood & craft of doctors as healers.
Is our New Zealand Medical Council independent? Or is it captured by a private global organisation with shady funding?
Watch NZDSOS member, Dr Bruce Dooley talk with Liz Gunn about what is going on behind the closed doors of our regulatory bodies.
A special thank you from NZDSOS to Liz Gunn and FreeNZ for bringing to light this very important topic that has lain hidden from New Zealand and the world – up until now.
Dr Dooley discusses what he learned about the Federation of State Medical Boards (FSMB) and its international arm, the International Association of Medical Regulatory Authorities (IAMRA) and how the Medical Council of New Zealand (MCNZ) is involved.
The FSMB is a private organisation that has captured, and probably controls, medical councils around the world, including the MCNZ. They purportedly exist to prevent harm to the public. However, with no public governance, it is the FSMB that decides what “harm” or “questionable health care practice” is. The doctors and the public do not get a say. While at present we cannot point to evidence, it would be interesting to know, whether the pharmaceutical inducstry has any influence on these organisations. As far back as 1999 the FSMB’s Special Committee on Health Care Fraud stated:
"Medical interventions that do not conform to prevailing scientific standards are becoming increasingly popular. It is estimated that in 1990, Americans made 425 million visits to providers of "unconventional" medicine, exceeding the number of visits to all U.S. primary care physicians, at a cost of approximately $13.7 billion."
As the say, follow the money.
We note that the MCNZ CEO, Joan Simeon is the Chair-Elect of the IAMRA until 2024 and is then the Chair until 2026. Where does her allegiance lie? To the people of New Zealand or to the funders of the FSMB/IAMRA?
Over 20 NZDSOS professionals are under investigation by the MCNZ for doing nothing more than upholding patients’ rights to fully informed consent, providing proven treatments (that Pfizer does not want you to know about), speaking out about harm, asking questions, and asking for discussion.
Do you want your doctor to be independent? To be your advocate? Do you want to have a choice of what treatments your doctor is allowed to prescribe or even talk about?
Just as we know that the protests, letters to authorities, support of media willing to tell a different narrative, the sharing of information amongst our networks and legal action (whether or not obviously successful) helped to remove some of the mandates, so will the same actions help to preserve not just doctors and their craft, but also the health of every individual in New Zealand and the world.
Please share this interview widely, as much for all our safety, now that we have this information and are part of a move around the world to discover where the heart of corruption truly might lie. If we have grabbed the tail of a beast, we must not let go.
Sadly it is no exaggeration to say that the mysterious deaths of many integrative doctors and naturopaths, mainly in the US, remain unsolved. Some of them were known to some of us. It is vital that potentially epoch-shaking information such as this is not tightly held by a few vulnerable people.
Despite, or perhaps because of, the dramatic increase in excess deaths in New Zealand over the last 18 months, an amendment to the Coroner’s Act is before parliament. This amendment will create a “two-tier” system where a Coronial Associate will have the power to declare an unexpected death, as being from “unascertained natural causes”. This is couched in terms of facilitating “better access to justice for families and whānau…” and freeing up the coroners’ time to work on complex cases.
While we agree that the coronial service needs more people, expertise and resources and that families can often wait for several years for a coronial verdict, decreasing the scope of this service is not a way to improve it!
Essentially, the changes will allow the sweeping under the carpet of the significant increase in sudden deaths of “unascertained natural causes”. We all know what the likely cause is, but the government is intending even less scrutiny, with a new class of “under-coroner” being able to sign off deaths without inquests or even post mortems. We wonder why they bother, since many pathologists are not trained to look for telltale signs, are not even aware that they exist, or may be frankly biased.
Coroners have long existed as sentinels for society, to spot plague, poisoning, privation, neglect or serious wrong-doing. The very fact that there are excess deaths should lead to a diligent search for underlying causes and a detailed examination of all unexpected deaths as noted in our letter here. After all, the New Zealand public is still part of phase 3 and 4 clinical trials of the mRNA injection. The health regulators should be very attuned to any “signal” that these injections could cause harm. Yet, they try and make these go away in the name of “better access to justice”.
There is still time for public submissions on this all-too-obvious white-washing of the likely cause of excess deaths. https://www.parliament.nz/en/pb/sc/make-a-submission/document/53SCJU_SCF_BILL_125886/coroners-amendment-bill
You can write your own submission or use our template as a basis for your online submission. Be sure to add your own points and keep it polite.
Previous campaigns to get public submissions on health matters have been successful e.g. on regulating natural health. This one is crucial to maintain an, admittedly somewhat missing in action, coronial system. They have to know that we know the proposed further weakening can only benefit Pfizer, and future vaccine producers, not the people.