Seymour M. Hersh
8 Dec 2013
Barack Obama did not tell the whole story this autumn when he tried to make the case that Bashar al-Assad was responsible for the chemical weapons attack near Damascus on 21 August. In some instances, he omitted important intelligence, and in others he presented assumptions as facts. Most significant, he failed to acknowledge something known to the US intelligence community: that the Syrian army is not the only party in the country’s civil war with access to sarin, the nerve agent that a UN study concluded – without assessing responsibility – had been used in the rocket attack. In the months before the attack, the American intelligence agencies produced a series of highly classified reports, culminating in a formal Operations Order – a planning document that precedes a ground invasion – citing evidence that the al-Nusra Front, a jihadi group affiliated with al-Qaida, had mastered the mechanics of creating sarin and was capable of manufacturing it in quantity. When the attack occurred al-Nusra should have been a suspect, but the administration cherry-picked intelligence to justify a strike against Assad.
In his nationally televised speech about Syria on 10 September, Obama laid the blame for the nerve gas attack on the rebel-held suburb of Eastern Ghouta firmly on Assad’s government, and made it clear he was prepared to back up his earlier public warnings that any use of chemical weapons would cross a ‘red line’: ‘Assad’s government gassed to death over a thousand people,’ he said. ‘We know the Assad regime was responsible … And that is why, after careful deliberation, I determined that it is in the national security interests of the United States to respond to the Assad regime’s use of chemical weapons through a targeted military strike.’ Obama was going to war to back up a public threat, but he was doing so without knowing for sure who did what in the early morning of 21 August.
He cited a list of what appeared to be hard-won evidence of Assad’s culpability: ‘In the days leading up to August 21st, we know that Assad’s chemical weapons personnel prepared for an attack near an area where they mix sarin gas. They distributed gas masks to their troops. Then they fired rockets from a regime-controlled area into 11 neighbourhoods that the regime has been trying to wipe clear of opposition forces.’ Obama’s certainty was echoed at the time by Denis McDonough, his chief of staff, who told the New York Times: ‘No one with whom I’ve spoken doubts the intelligence’ directly linking Assad and his regime to the sarin attacks.
- Seymour Hersh: Obama Lied About Syria (newser.com)
- Liberal journalist Seymour Hersh says Obama made up the intelligence for war on Syria (fellowshipoftheminds.com)
- New Yorker, Washington Post Passed On Seymour Hersh Syria Report (huffingtonpost.com)
- Seymour Hersh: Obama administration nearly lied the U.S. into war with Syria (salon.com)
- New Yorker, Washington Post Passed On Seymour Hersh Syria Report (counterinformation.wordpress.com)
- Seymour Hersh Alleges Obama Administration Lied on Syria Gas Attack (thewire.com)
- Yahoo News: Seymour Hersh Alleges Obama Administration Lied on Syria Gas Attack (news.yahoo.com)
- Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist Seymour Hersh: Obama Lied on Syria Gas Attack (atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com)
- Seymour M. Hersh – Whose sarin? – (feliznavidad.newsvine.com)