10 Reasons MDs Should Sign Vaccine Medical Exemptions

Age of Autism | 12 Jan 2016

10 Reasons Why Doctors Should Not Hesitate to Sign Medical Exemptions for Vaccinations When That Is the Only Option Available to Patients/Parents

The end of the post includes an at-a-glance version you can copy and share.  Please do!

By Laura Hayes

  • 1. If a doctor cannot obtain informed consent from a patient/parent, then he can not morally, ethically, or legally refuse to sign a Medical Exemption for vaccination. Informed consent is the gold standard of ethical medicine, and must be obtained voluntarily, without any form of coercion, prior to any medical treatment or procedure in a society that considers itself free, ethical, and moral, and which has stringent laws regulating the practice of medicine, including informed consent laws. Furthermore, a doctor makes himself liable for refusing and/or failing to give and obtain prior, voluntary, and informed consent, for any medical treatment or procedure, including vaccination: . Therefore, without informed consent from a patient/parent, and when no other exemption options are left available to him and the patient/parent, a doctor must sign a Medical Exemption upon request.
  • 2. A doctor knows that he has no way to know whether or not a fetus, newborn, infant, or toddler is allergic to vaccine ingredients, beginning with the food ingredients listed. Furthermore, for non-food ingredients, such as antibiotics, metals such as mercury and aluminum, formaldehyde, and polysorbate 80, allergies won’t be known in advance and will only become apparent after the allergic reaction occurs and/or manifests itself, which could be in any number of ways, and at a later date. Every vaccine package insert warns not to give the vaccine to anyone who is allergic to any of the vaccine’s ingredients. Therefore, doctors should sign Medical Exemptions based on the fact that it cannot be known in advance what allergies babies/children/patients of all ages will have, especially to ingredients that are injected versus consumed, many of which are non-food ingredients. Therefore, a doctor should have no qualms signing a Medical Exemption for any patient/parent who requests one.
  • 3. A doctor is not to violate his oath to “First, do no harm.” Any doctor who has read even just one vaccine package insert knows that he may indeed harm, possibly kill, any patient he vaccinates. Therefore, he knows he must honor the decision any patient/parent makes to decline one, some, or all vaccinations, and sign a Medical Exemption should they request one. Furthermore, it can be argued that a doctor should not be comfortable vaccinating any patient after: investigating the lack of proper testing that has been done on both vaccines individually and on the CDC’s recommended schedule, which includes giving multiple vaccines at one time; investigating the chronic illnesses, physical and developmental disabilities, and deaths that result from vaccines; reading the list of toxic, carcinogenic, and inflammatory ingredients contained in vaccines that he would then be injecting into a human being; investigating the fraud, deception, and corruption that occur at all levels of our nation’s vaccine program, from manufacture to mandate. Such research should compel a doctor, and render him extremely willing, to sign Medical Exemptions for his patients.
  • 4. A doctor who has investigated how vaccine trials are done knows that they are not done according to the gold standard of medical research, that of a double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Quite the contrary. They are not double-blind, in other words, unvaccinated controls are not used for proper comparison. Additionally, placebos are not used, rather, another vaccine, and even more often, multiple vaccines, and/or an adjuvant (such as aluminum, known to cause adverse reactions in and of itself) are used. Despite the lack of using proper study methods, vaccines are declared “safe and effective”. Additionally, they have never been tested in the myriad combinations in which they are administered. Learn more here. Thus, no doctor should have any confidence in administering any vaccine, and as such, should willingly and gladly sign a Medical Exemption for any patient/parent who requests one.

 

  • 5. A doctor for whom vaccines violate his or his patient’s religious beliefs should be willing to sign a Medical Exemption. Whether it is the aborted fetal material in vaccines, wrongly forcing one’s will on another resulting in medical assault, violating a parent’s God-given right to direct the care and upbringing of their child, violating a person’s fundamental human right to make medical decisions for himself, or trusting in the efficacy and efficiency of a person’s God-given immune system, a doctor should sign a Medical Exemption for religious objections without qualm. By doing so, he is upholding the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, which protects religious freedom. For some doctors, they may be prioritizing following God’s law above man’s laws, as the Bible instructs.
  • 6. A doctor should sign a Medical Exemption for any patient/parent who does not want to negatively impact, and forever forfeit, permanent, lifetime immunity for the diseases against which we vaccinate. This doctor should also sign a Medical Exemption for the patient/parent who does not want to forever forfeit additional benefits that come from contracting certain illnesses during childhood, benefits that play out over the course of a lifetime, including protecting against many types of cancer.
  • 7. A doctor should sign a Medical Exemption upon request because he is responsible for knowing that vaccines are not tested for carcinogenic or mutagenic effects, providing yet another reason why no person/parent should have to accept them against their will.
  • 8. A doctor who is a patriot will sign a Medical Exemption for any patient/parent who requests one because he knows that our U.S. Constitution and First Amendment grant his patients the right to make medical decisions for themselves and their children, and numerous international Codes of Ethics, to which the U.S. is a signor, protect and uphold that right.
  • 9. No doctor should be comfortable helping to implement a law authored by a man, a pediatrician no less, who is so ignorant as to publicly state at UC Berkeley’s Public School of Health that water is the most dangerous ingredient in vaccines. That fact is yet another reason doctors should sign Medical Exemptions for patients/parents without hesitation.
  • 10. Lastly, doctors should sign Medical Exemptions because good health is not achieved by the barbaric practice of injecting poisonous ingredients which cause toxicity, inflammation, and unnatural viral infection, three of the most damaging things for a fetus, newborn, infant, toddler, or young child, whose brains and bodily systems are immature and in rapid states of development. Good health does not come through a needle, pill, or spray. Doctors, in many cases, need to refocus their efforts on safe, health-inducing, and risk-free ways to protect, maintain, and enhance their patients’ health, without the use of risk-laden vaccines.

This list not only provides many reasons why a doctor should sign a Medical Exemption for any patient/parent who requests one, but this list should also compel every doctor in the U.S. to sign a Medical Exemption for any patient/parent who requests one, as in some states, this is the only way left for an individual/parent to protect themselves and their children from the known dangers of vaccine mandates.

We need doctors in our country to step up to the plate and find the moral courage that is needed to speak up and out in the face of this medical tyranny, in the face of this present evil. We need doctors to do whatever is needed to protect their patients.

Doctors need to remember that a simple “No thank you” should always suffice when a patient/parent wants to decline a medical treatment or procedure, including vaccination.

If you are a doctor, will you act morally and ethically to protect the rights of your patients by signing Medical Exemptions for those patients/parents who ask, when that is the only means of protection available for them? If not, are you willing and comfortable dismissing all of the aforementioned reasons? Which rights and freedoms are you willing to be responsible for violating? Why should you be allowed to continue practicing medicine when you won’t follow the gold standard of ethical medicine, that of prior, voluntary/non-coerced, and informed consent?

Finally, Americans should be able to, and need to be able to, count on doctors to oppose any and all medical mandates. History has shown us that doctors and medicine can be wrong, very wrong, and it has also shown us just how horrific and inhumane humans can be to other humans when allowed to engage in forced medicine.|

Download Laura Hayes’ Vaccine Exemption List

  1. A doctor cannot obtain prior, voluntary and non-coerced, informed consent from a patient/parent.
  2. A doctor has no way to know if a fetus, newborn, infant, or toddler is allergic to the ingredients in vaccines. This applies to patients of all ages.
  3. A doctor is not to violate his oath to “First, do no harm.”
  4. A doctor is responsible for knowing that vaccine trials have not been performed using double-blind, placebo-controlled trials, nor has the CDC-recommended vaccine schedule been tested as it is recommended to be administered.
  5. A doctor is not to violate the religious beliefs of his patients, nor should he be required to violate his own religious beliefs.
  6. A doctor is to respect and abide by a patient’s/parent’s desire not to forfeit the benefits of contracting illnesses naturally.
  7. A doctor is responsible for knowing that vaccines have not been tested for carcinogenic or mutagenic effects.
  8. A doctor is not comfortable violating a patient’s/parent’s Constitutional and First Amendment rights, nor is he comfortable violating international codes of ethics.
  9. A doctor is not comfortable implementing a forced medicine law authored by a colleague who holds the false and dangerous belief that water is the most dangerous ingredient in vaccines.
  10. A doctor knows that there are risk-free ways to protect, maintain, and enhance his patients’ health, without the use of risk-laden vaccines.

Doctors need to remember that a simple “No thank you” should always suffice when a patient/parent wants to decline a medical treatment or procedure, including vaccination.

Leave a Reply